Comments on: How To Use Digg and Reddit to Piss Off Rush Limbaugh Listeners

By: LOL

LOL — Tue, 28 Dec 2010 16:43:51 +0000

Your article is spot on. Rush is a snake oil used car salesman

By: Barnegat Blummis

Barnegat Blummis — Mon, 17 May 2010 17:15:31 +0000

I love your work! Rush Limbaugh is a cancer on the balls of Uncle Sam and should be excised and discarded with the other hazardous waste. He is a knowing sly hypocrite and his followers make sheep look independent and wise.

By: Is Glenn Beck Stealing Stephen Colbert’s Schtick? | MuckMakers.com

Is Glenn Beck Stealing Stephen Colbert’s Schtick? | MuckMakers.com — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 06:08:36 +0000

[...] thing we’ve addressed on the site before is the sincerity of punditry…and boy has it gotten us into a lot of shit. When we posted an old video of Rush Limbaugh freely admitting that he’s just an entertainer and [...]

By: Jason

Jason — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 03:45:46 +0000

@Adj
I’m not the author, but I can provide a response to your satirical question:
Many liberals, like Obama, loooooooove God. They’re all very religious. Others, like me, are atheist and don’t believe in God at all, so how can I hate that which I don’t think exists? It’s like hating unicorns. No one hates unicorns. They just don’t think they exist.

As for cute little puppies, they’re very tasty, I love them ;P

By: Adj

Adj — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:40:06 +0000

This is directed to the author; one simple question:

When will liberals stop hating God and cute little puppies?

I have never seen a liberal response that reconciles the answer to this question.

By: someSnarkyBastard

someSnarkyBastard — Mon, 08 Jun 2009 18:19:51 +0000

Holy asbestos, Batman! Creating flamewars in teh intrewebs sure looks fun!

Seriously, congrats on the little social experiment, thread-rage always makes for good reading material. I came here on SU, gave you a thumbs up.

By: Introducing Twitter Tuesdays | MuckMakers.com

Introducing Twitter Tuesdays | MuckMakers.com — Wed, 27 May 2009 03:15:54 +0000

[...] looking for a good laugh. The same thing happened to my article about Rush Limbaugh listeners (How to Use Digg and Reddit to Piss Off Rush Limbaugh Listeners), so whoever is submitting our stuff to StumbleUpon, we appreciate your sexy link lovin’…or [...]

By: ALibertarianJew

ALibertarianJew — Thu, 21 May 2009 10:33:09 +0000

Wow,

The brilliance has me stunned, the entertainment value is epic, and I’m asking for more. Plz for the sake of G-d (and of the zombies) do this more often. It just might be the cure for Rushists to rejoin humanity.

By: Rich

Rich — Mon, 18 May 2009 07:45:08 +0000

This is directed at ELT; one simple question:

What the FUCK does this have to do with the article? Smells like a typical misdirection technique to me.

But I’ll bite and answer your question anyway: I fail to see a conservative plan that succeeds in fixing the very same problem. In fact, we followed a conservative plan over the last eight years. In just two terms, a GOP administration spent every last dollar we had (Bush came into a surplus, mind you) and sent us spiraling into a record deficit. If you cared enough to read around the site a bit more, you’d find that I am very much behind the “less spending, more personal responsibility” claim of the GOP…I just have yet to see this claim in action. Go look up what Mr. Bush spent our money on and tell me that you wouldn’t have bashed a liberal president for misspending as freely as he did.

The reason that no one can answer your question directly is because it is riddled with logical fallacies. You are basing your question on the assumption that a liberal administration has specifically claimed that spending more and collecting less taxes is the way society should be run. I’m not a fan of the bailouts either, but McCain was right there with Obama, claiming that they were completely necessary. To label overspending or misspending as “liberal” is disingenuous and misleading, and you know it.

By: ELT

ELT — Mon, 18 May 2009 01:12:49 +0000

This is directed to the author; one simple question:

How does society succeed when the amount of money collected (taxes) falls short of the amount of money paid out (by government)?

I have never seen a liberal plan that reconciles the answer to this question.